The German chancellor is one of the most powerful executives in the world, especially when compared to the executive branches of other democracies such as the British Prime Minister and the President of the United States. The several different duties that these executives have is what clearly makes these executives different in both issues of authority and power.
There are several differences in power between the German chancellor and the President in the United States. One major one is that in Germany there is a dual executive branch. The Chancellor works to set agenda and work as the head of the government. The German President works as a figure above the role of policy and agendas. He acts simply as a head of state, and as a representative of Germany. Within the the United States, the President acts as both the head of government and the head of state. He is the figure who represents the United States on a global level.
Another major difference is that the German chancellor has more control over laws and legislation within Germany. With the cabinet, they consult with experts and work together to get their goals accomplished. They do not have as high as a success rate and as easy of time than the Prime Minister in Great Britain has, but they are still able to successful pass most of their legislation even with compromises and revisions. This differs greatly from the system of government in the United States. The President is free to ask for certain laws or agendas in his speeches, but even with his party in power there is no guarantee that the laws that he wants passed will be passed. It often takes extreme negotiations and bargaining. If the party in control of Congress differs from the party of the President, there is a good chance that there will be gridlock when controversial legislation occurs.
Perhaps the most striking difference between the German chancellor and the President in the United States is the way the two are elected. As we are currently seeing, to be elected in the United States takes massive amounts of money, nonstop media attention, and pandering to interest groups. The focus is often only on the candidate and less on the party ideals that they belong to. However, in Germany, the German people decide first which party they want in control, and then the winning party choses the leader. In my opinion, this is still very much partisan politics, but the issues and the parties are more in the spotlight than the candidates personalties and looks, like I feel is often the case within the United States.
Even though the United States helped the German people construct their system of government, it has very key differences especially when the executive branch is concerned. After learning about the German government, I believe many of these differences would be welcomed in the United States.
There are several differences in power between the German chancellor and the President in the United States. One major one is that in Germany there is a dual executive branch. The Chancellor works to set agenda and work as the head of the government. The German President works as a figure above the role of policy and agendas. He acts simply as a head of state, and as a representative of Germany. Within the the United States, the President acts as both the head of government and the head of state. He is the figure who represents the United States on a global level.
Another major difference is that the German chancellor has more control over laws and legislation within Germany. With the cabinet, they consult with experts and work together to get their goals accomplished. They do not have as high as a success rate and as easy of time than the Prime Minister in Great Britain has, but they are still able to successful pass most of their legislation even with compromises and revisions. This differs greatly from the system of government in the United States. The President is free to ask for certain laws or agendas in his speeches, but even with his party in power there is no guarantee that the laws that he wants passed will be passed. It often takes extreme negotiations and bargaining. If the party in control of Congress differs from the party of the President, there is a good chance that there will be gridlock when controversial legislation occurs.
Perhaps the most striking difference between the German chancellor and the President in the United States is the way the two are elected. As we are currently seeing, to be elected in the United States takes massive amounts of money, nonstop media attention, and pandering to interest groups. The focus is often only on the candidate and less on the party ideals that they belong to. However, in Germany, the German people decide first which party they want in control, and then the winning party choses the leader. In my opinion, this is still very much partisan politics, but the issues and the parties are more in the spotlight than the candidates personalties and looks, like I feel is often the case within the United States.
Even though the United States helped the German people construct their system of government, it has very key differences especially when the executive branch is concerned. After learning about the German government, I believe many of these differences would be welcomed in the United States.
No comments:
Post a Comment